White men are the tallest of all races. Penis size (length and girth) correlates (P < 0.001 - extremely significant in all studies) with height, and has been proven to definitely NOT correlate with race alone. Therefore, since penis size only correlates with height, White Men as the tallest definitely have the largest members. Indians, negroes, australoids and other South Asians have the smallest members. Poles, as the tallest among the tallest, have the largest members.

Source: Height and body-mass index trajectories of school-aged children and adolescents from 1985 to 2019 in 200 countries and territories: a pooled analysis of 2181 population-based studies with 65 million participants. Lancet 2020, 396:1511-1524 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31859-6/

Source: Fig. 3. Meta-regression model for mean erect length over the year of publication by (A) regions of origin https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10523114/ 

.

Collecting the research was difficult because of the outright lies perpetrated by media corporations clogging up search results with theses opposite to the truth.

In the phenomenon in question, it is important to pay attention to: 
1. On whom the study was conducted - the only measurements carried out on Poles, were made on people under anesthesia while performing surgery. At the same time, studies on negroids were usually carried out among people who volunteered for such measurements, while it has been proven that in every country, people who volunteer for such studies by themselves have a size well above average. Above that, they were healthy and conscious.

Source: Average-Size Erect Penis: Fiction, Fact, and the Need for Counseling Bruce M. KingDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1787279

When measurements were taken on a reasonably representative group of Tanzanians, it was found that the average size was 11cm. In this case, all patients who showed up at the urology clinic were surveyed - only those with erectile problems, eunuchs and adolescents under 18 were omitted (minors in separate results). 

 

.

2. The form of the study and the quality of the research conducted - it mattered who measured and what method was used. In studies from South America, measurements were made using the method of 'penis stretching' which gave longer sizes which distorted the results. Tests done by the subjects themselves always gave a higher result than those done by doctors. It also mattered how the erection was induced - pharmacologically induced gave greater results. Generally speaking, the most accurate method is the measurement made in a medical facility, by people with medical training, involving measurements at rest and of the stretched penis. The temperature of the room and the temperature outside (weather, season) also matter, of course.

Source: Average-Size Erect Penis: Fiction, Fact, and the Need for Counseling Bruce M. KingDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1787279

Turning to the results, they are as follows:
Penis size, and height:
1. "In a random sample of 325 subjects of the same set of people, penile length and circumference were also correlated with weight and height. Statistical analysis was performed with the Sperman test, because our data were not normally distributed as tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p<0.01). Results: The median values of penile dimensions recorded in the present study are flaccid length 9.0 cm, flaccid circumference, at the middle of the shaft, 10.0 cm, and stretched length 12.5 cm. We also observed that the penile dimensions are highly correlated with height and weight." Penile Length and Circumference: A Study on 3,300 Young Italian Males European Urology (2001) 39 (2): 183-186. https://doi.org/10.1159/000052434 https://karger.com/eur/article-abstract/39/2/183/132814/Penile-Length-and-Circumference-A-Study-on-3-300

2. "Multivariate regression analysis showed that penile dimensions are significantly correlated with age (P=0.018), height (P<0.001) and index finger length (P<0.001)." Mehraban, D., Salehi, M. & Zayeri, F. Penile size and somatometric parameters among Iranian normal adult men. Int J Impot Res 19, 303-309 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901532

3. "correlations were found between penile length (both flaccid and stretched) and height, weight and body mass index, respectively (P<0.001, for all). These results demonstrate that somatometric parameters are correlated with penile length. We believe that further studies would provide more information about the causal relationship." Aslan, Y., Atan, A., Aydin, A. O., Nalҫacioğlu, V., Tuncel, A., & Kadioğlu, A. (2011). Penile length and somatometric parameters: A study in healthy young Turkish men. Asian Journal of Andrology, 13, 339-341. https://www.asiaandro.com/Abstract.asp?doi=10.1038/aja.2010.109

4. Promodu, K., Shanmughadas, K. V., Bhat, S., & Nair, K. R. (2007). Penile length and circumference: An Indian study. International Journal of Impotence Research, 19, 558-563.

.

5. Spyropoulos, E., Borousas, D., Mavrikos, S., Dellis, A., Bourounis, M., & Athanasiadis, S. (2002). Size of external genital organs and somatometric parameters among physically normal men younger than 40 years old. Urology, 60, 485-491.

.

No correlation with race:
1. Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., & Sanders, S. A. (2014). Erect penile length and circumference dimensions of 1,661 sexually active men in the United States. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 93-101. https://academic.oup.com/jsm/article-abstract/11/1/93/6958411

2. "Nomograms for flaccid pendulous [n = 10,704, mean (sd) 9.16 (1.57) cm] and stretched length [n = 14,160, mean (sd) 13.24 (1.89) cm], erect length [n = 692, mean (sd) 13.12 (1.66) cm], flaccid circumference [n = 9407, mean (sd) 9.31 (0.90) cm], and erect circumference [n = 381, mean (sd) 11.66 (1.10) cm] were constructed. Consistent and strongest significant correlation was between flaccid stretched or erect length and height, which ranged from r = 0.2 to 0.6. Limitations: relatively few erect measurements were conducted in a clinical setting and the greatest variability between studies was seen with flaccid stretched length." Veale, D., Miles, S., Bramley, S., Muir, G., & Hodsoll, J. (2015). Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15521 men. BJU International, 115, 978-986.  https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010

Conclusion: people are proportional, if someone is tall it means he is big. He will have a longer index finger, and a longer penis. Tall, big, are Europeans, once called Aryans, today some 'Caucasian race'. At the same time, negroids, australoids, South Asians, are short, small, micro. How can one have doubts in the face of something so obvious?

Questions: why the pressure in the mainstream media to propagate lies belittling White men, while lyingly praising negroid micros? Why do they lie that populations averaging 15cm shorter than Poles, for example, have anything larger? For so many years they lied, repeated like a mantra, it can't be a coincidence, because at the same time they didn't report what actually negroes larger and 50 times larger than Poles - the scale of HIV infection (5% of sub-Saharan negroes have HIV www.aktualnaagenda.pl/?tags=hiv ). 

 

Source: https://www.medme.pl/artykuly/-srednia-dlugosc-penisa-jaki-jest-przecietny-rozmiar-penisa,69777.html

Drawn from, among others: King, B. M. (2021). Average-Size Erect Penis: Fiction, Fact, and the Need for Counseling. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 47(1), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1787279   www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1787279

.