The thesis of the connection with the Natufians was promoted because they did not have Nendertal genes. Of course they didn't, because they were cro-magnon, and he didn't have any. I don't know why cro-magnons' skeletons are forcefully left out of the analysis because it is obvious that it was the white people of modern Europeans, and cro-magnons at that time, who built every civilization. This can be seen in the DNA of the ancients, modern achievements, and the culture surrounding the graves of the cro-magnons. They showed up and immediately looked different from the rest, and were far more advanced than anything previously found. Paleogenetic results show no significant influx of African genes into the Neolithic Near East. Lazaridis et al. (2016) explicitly stated that statistical analyses of Natufite populations (ancient hunters of the Levant) do not reveal any elevated affiliation with sub-Saharan African populations. The presence of an African component in f4/Nascent Eurasia statistics is the same as in other ancient Eurasians, ruling out additional mixing with sub-Saharan populations. Similarly, mixing models (qpAdm) of Neolithic populations of Anatolia and the Levant explain their origins based solely on local and Caucasian sources, without the need to introduce an African element. In conclusion, the genome reconstructions of ancient Middle Eastern societies lack the signature characteristic of sub-Saharan African peoples, indicating that migrations from this region did not play a significant role in the Neolithic era of Southern Arc